MONZÓN CANCINO MARIA
CONCHITA
TIC’S
RAFAEL FERRER MÉNDEZ
JUNE 22, 2015
COMPUTER
ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERACTIVE APPROACH:
ADVANTAGES AND APPREHENSIONS
To begin with the question
whether computers really assist second language learning, many teachers who
have never touched a computer tend to respond with an emphatic no; whereas, the
overwhelming number of teachers who give computers a try find that they are
indeed useful in second language learning. No doubt, computers make excellent
teaching tools, especially in teaching languages in any aspect, be it
vocabulary, grammar, composition, pronunciation, or other linguistic and
pragmatic communicative skills.
And the major benefits offered by
computer in enhancing language acquisition apparently outweigh its limitations.
Is very important talk about
interest and motivation. It is often necessary, in a language learning
classroom, to provide repeated practice to meet important objectives. Because
this can be boring, painful, and frustrating, many students lose interest and
motivation to learn foreign languages.
CALL programmers present the learner with a
novelty. They teach the language in different and more interesting, attractive
ways and present language through games, animated graphics and problem-solving
techniques. As a result even tedious drills become more interesting. In fact,
CALL motivates the students to go beyond the point of initial mastery and
practice activity until they become automatic.
Many students need additional
time and individualized practice to meet learning objectives. The computer
offers students self-instructional tasks that let them master prerequisite
skills and objectives at a speed and level dictated by their own needs. Besides,
additional programmers can be made available for students who master objectives
quickly.
Computer database can be used by
the instructor to classify and differentiate the type of general errors as well
as errors committed by learners on account of the influence of the first
language.
In spite of its glaring merits,
the prospect of computer-assisted language learning has troubled teachers more.
Perhaps, the major cause of their worry might have developed from the basic
problem of accessibility.
Often the computers have been
kept in Science or Math’s department causing a real and psychological distance
in the minds of the Arts faculty. Nevertheless, many see computer as a threat
not only in terms of its power to replace the traditional skills, which the
language teachers promote, but also its eventual replacement of the teacher
himself.
Furthermore, shifting the control
center from the authoritarian teacher to the need-based learner and accepting
the humble role of a facilitator/moderator instead of being a veritable
dictator does not come easy for the traditionally clad chalk-talk teacher. In
addition, the computer-student interactive learning not only allows the
possibility of role changes, but also the potential for role-reversal,
endangered by physical reversal by students.
Computer-Assisted Language
Learning(CALL) contrasted with Textbook-Assisted Language Learning (TALL),
demands certain extra-skills such as typography, graphic design, or paper
making and the lack of which panics the teacher and the taught alike.
For instance, an inadvertent typographical
error on the part of the student input may be classified wrong although the
grammar of the student's answer is correct. Further, in terms of communication
of ideas, a book is a means of communication between the author and the reader.
Yet, these apprehensions should
be seen in the backdrop of a developmental stage of computerisation of
individuals and institutions and as a temporary phenomenon. The next generation
of teachers and learners will be part of a computer generation.
They will take for granted the
skills demanded by computer technology and handle it as coolly as switching on
a taperecorder or watching a television. Similarly, the pupils will need no
readjustment of attitude when faced with a computer in a classroom and their
familiarity and frequent association with the machine would replace the sense
of awe and alienation felt by older people.
MENDOZA, M. (2015, June 17). CALL. Retrieved
October 17, 2015.
KITCHEN, D. (2009, August 10). ICT. Retrieved September
21, 2016.
CORNEY, H. (2011,
February 27). Technology ICT. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario